|
[Search]
|
|
Below are links to calls for action and coalition by Louisville Neighborhood Groups. Send us your Neighborhood Action Reports and calls for support and we'll post them here. Neighbors, rally 'round your neighbors! Click here to find out about the Next Advocacy Committee meeting. Click here for an overview of Advocacy Working Group links. To submit an action item to be posted, send it to the Louisville Neighborhoods email listserv with a note that you want the item put on the Web Site: Click here to Subscribe and send items to the Louisville Neighborhoods email group LCON's Advocacy Committee meets regularly. Neighborhoods, individuals, and organizations are welcomed and encouraged to get their issues to neighborhoods through LCON communications, and to build support through the Neighborhoods Coalition for community-wide issues campaigns. [Top] From Neighborhoods: Bonnycastle Neighborhood Call for Support on Moratorium From Community Groups: CART and the Bus Riders Union Voter Registration Campaign Invitation to Neighborhood groups to Participate in People's Agenda [Top] Bonnycastle Neighborhood Call for Support on Moratorium From: Schuh <schuh@emainisp.net> July 20, 2002 [Top] From: "doug lowry" <wiredlow@hotmail.com> To: cjletter@courier-journal.com CC: wiredlow@hotmail.com Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:09:44 +0000 The CJ recently ran an article praising GLI for its effectiveness in reaching its goals, but ran an editorial pondering why Bonnycastle wouldn’t want a Cogan hi-rise. Don’t get me wrong: GLI deserves praise and the Cogan development will be a quality construction, I’m sure. Five years ago, Louisville set out on a 12-year quest to transform itself from a nice-but-average city into ''one of the most competitive locations for business in the United States.'' It has come a long way toward goal achievement, but it won’t get there without strong effective neighborhoods. Since the CJ has planted itself editorially as pro-merger and considered the Brookings report so generously, it needs to reconsider its approach to neighborhoods. The Courier could and should do more to help neighborhoods live up to their native role of local control of quality of life and hold others entities accountable for their role in negatively impacting whatever criteria neighborhoods rightly define as their quality of life. Someone needs to help the CJ understand why a neighborhood such as Fairdale or Bonnycastle feels the way it does (rightly or wrongly) about the Cogan developments. Someone needs to prod the CJ to critique the business community when it works over and around instead of with neighborhoods. What would it take for the CJ to praise LCON or an individual neighborhood association (like Bonnycastle) for achieving it goals? What critiques did the CJ offer to GLI's measurement of success, given that many of these successes will produce many of the very things the Brookings Institution report warns against? In my opinion, neighborhoods’ reactions to the Cogan projects are symptomatic of a larger problem. The Bonnycastle Neighborhood Association is doing its part to build quality of life for the City of Louisville, which is now the de jure factor in measuring a city's efforts to build economic vitality. In this model, neighborhoods move from the warm and fuzzy Wednesday part of the paper to the daily business news section. As a community we seem to be shoving neighborhoods and local interests out of the way as we selectively “develop” our community. What seems like progress and economic development, however winsome to some, doesn't look so great when you are in the shadow of it. Just ask the neighbors of Cardinal Stadium, the airport, or Brownsboro Crossing’s neighbors! Why didn't the Courier take the time to suppose why neighborhoods like Bonnycastle want to be left out of the “development” plan--look at the Bullitt property development by Oxmoor, the decision to build Ohio River bridges and other massive projects that have grave potential to adversely affect quality of life in Louisville/Jefferson County. Look at the cost and continued negative impact of the airport expansion as an example of “success”. It looks great from an east-end McMansion, but not so nice from Beechmont! Neighborhoods are skittish on merger and the CJ’s editorial doesn’t help. Although I can understand the tenor of the CJ's editorial position, I am confident that the people who live and invest themselves daily in Bonnycastle know what they do and don't want in their neighborhood. It is clear that neighborhoods believe the operational mentality of the powers-that-be with neighborhoods is more "do to" than "do with". A better editorial might have asked why certain alderman were not present to cast a vote one way or the other on the moratorium and why alderman did or didn't vote for the continued moratorium, which clearly better fit a neighborhood plan that had been worked on for so long by so many. Since Bill Allison won't be serving the area in January, the CJ should ask if it isn’t incumbent upon other alderman to represent the wishes of the people who live there. Is that the model we want alderman who will become council members to follow? Doesn't the CJ want to encourage the sanctity of local control by the people who live there, especially among the whole body of the Metro Council? If the Courier is interested in building a better Louisville, then it needs to takes it role of understanding, editorializing, and reporting on its home city's neighborhoods more seriously. The Courier needs to be more critical of the business community and the impact of decisions that are clearly more gut wrenching at the neighborhood level than they are from the editorial offices of the CJ, the aldermanic chambers or the 38th floor of the PNC building. The CJ should ask if development decisions---individually and collectively---pass muster with the general principals that the Brookings report and the principles of neighborliness suggest. The Courier seems to lack the capacity to wax reflective on economic development that in Jefferson County is all too often a choice among evils. Neighborhoods are not just about festivals and recipes, but about building the spirit of the community and cooking up successes in its individual corners. The CJ needs to build that spirit, not bash it. Doug Lowry 5700 Southland Blvd Louisville, Kentucky 40214 502-500-3482 [Top] From: "Michael Baugh" <baughfam@bellsouth.net> Date: Sat Jul 27, 2002 9:41 am Subject: Re: [Louisville_Neighborhoods] Land Development Code A repeat on John's reminder that the next meeting to discuss the Land Development Code is on August 1st at 5:30, and you can view the current version at http://www.jefferson.ky.us/PlanDev/LDC.htm ----- Original Message ----- From: johnbaker40206 <Johnbaker@bellsouth.net> To: <Louisville_Neighborhoods@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 11:23 AM Subject: [Louisville_Neighborhoods] Land Development Code > Hello! Below is an announcement regarding the draft land development > code and Clifton's suggested response. > > The Louisville and Jefferson County Planning Commission has held > three public hearings on sections of the draft land development code. > The third public hearing, held yesterday on July 18, covered the > complete land development code, including revised versions of > sections previously released. This public hearing also covered the > new Form District Map. The Planning Commission continued this public > hearing to August 1, at 5:30 p.m. at the Old Jail Building, 514 W. > Liberty Street. Comments on the draft land development code continue > to be taken, and can be forwarded to Planning and > Development Services staff at plandev@co.jefferson.ky.us > <mailto:plandev@co.jefferson.ky.us>, or faxed to (502)574-8129, or > forwarded > to the following address: 531 Court Place, Suite 900, Louisville, KY > 40202. > > The Clifton Community Council strongly urges everyone to respond to > the DLC. We particularly urge all neighborhood to support > Neighborhood Plans. Specifically, this means having inserted in > Chapter 11 - Development Review Process the following: > > 11.4.2, 11.5A, and 11.5B: "Change shall be in compliance with the > established Neighborhood Plan". > > Thanks, > John Baker > Clifton > > [Top] CART & the Bus Riders Union's Voter Registration Campaign.
[Top] Invitation to Neighborhood Groups to Participate in ongoing People's Agenda Development The "Conference for a People's Agenda" was convened August 24, 2002 to develop a common community based People's Agenda for Louisville, Kentucky in the face of the creation of new government under City-County merger. The conference synthesized several hundred policy proposals in areas such as Civil and Human Rights, Community Governance, Criminal Justice, Economic Development through Community Empowerment, Housing, Education and Youth Empowerment, Environment, Health, Human Services and Workers Rights. Over 32 community organizations participated in the call for the conference, and many more are becoming involved. As organizers point out, "The event was a major success and was historic because it brought together in a working setting such a wide diversity of people and groups, something that had not happened on this scale in Louisville in anyone's memory - and also because there was a spirit of hope and commitment as participants realized that with all of us working together we really do have the power to shape the future of our community." To learn how you or your organizations can participate in the development of the People's Agenda, take a look at our Campaign Strategy. Contact information:
![]() Click to subscribe to peoplesagenda [Top] |
Louisville NeighborhoodsWeb Site Development Services by
|